Skip to content

Last season (2025-26)

What changed?

Players whose game really moved: more minutes, a bigger role, a new shot diet. Each change comes with the likely reason and how much of it should hold.

The 2026-27 season does not have enough games yet, so this shows 2025-26: each player's last 25 games (or his games since a role change or a trade) against the rest of his season. Once players have about 20 games this season, the page switches to this season by itself.

Biggest real changes

279 of 393 players flagged

Showing 20 changes, biggest first (size after the "is it real?" pull). Clear filters

Jordan ClarksonG · NYKProbably real
3-point rate-23 pts

30 games since Jan 19 vs the 42 games before

Clarkson's 3-point rate is down 23 points over his 30 games since Jan 19 (25% vs 48%). The likely reason: Miles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 10 of 40 games. Probably real: about 70% should hold.

  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 10 of 40 games
Karl-Anthony TownsC · NYKProbably real
TS%+8.6 pts

Last 25 games of the season vs the 50 games before

Towns's TS% is up 8.6 points over his last 25 games of the season (67.8% vs 59.2%). Most of it is shot-making: his TS% was 4.5 points above what his shot spots predict (4.5 points below before), with Miles McBride out. Probably real: about 70% should hold.

  • Shot-makingHis TS% was 4.5 points above what his shot spots predict (4.5 points below before) (about 100% of the change)
  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 27 games
Jose AlvaradoG · NYKProbably real
3-point rate-13 pts

28 games with NYK vs the 41 games before

Alvarado's 3-point rate is down 13 points over his 28 games with NYK (56% vs 69%). The likely reason: he moved from NOP to NYK (first game Feb 8). Probably real: about 70% should hold.

  • New teamHe moved from NOP to NYK (first game Feb 8)
Jordan ClarksonG · NYKProbably real
Above-the-break 3 share-13 pts

30 games since Jan 19 vs the 42 games before

Clarkson's above-the-break 3 share is down 13 points over his 30 games since Jan 19 (16% vs 29%). The likely reason: Miles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 10 of 40 games. Probably real: about 70% should hold.

  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 10 of 40 games
OG AnunobyF · NYKProbably real
TS%+6.8 pts

Last 25 games of the season vs the 42 games before

Anunoby's TS% is up 6.8 points over his last 25 games of the season (66.4% vs 59.6%). Most of it is shot-making: his TS% was 5.1 points above what his shot spots predict (2.0 points below before), with Miles McBride out. Probably real: about 65% should hold.

  • Shot-makingHis TS% was 5.1 points above what his shot spots predict (2.0 points below before) (about 100% of the change)
  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 25 games
Miles McBrideG · NYKPartly real
Minutes-9.0

9 games since Jan 21 vs the 32 games before

McBride's playing time is down 9.0 minutes a game over his 9 games since Jan 21 (19.3 vs 28.3). No clear cause shows up in our data; it could be an injury, a coaching choice or the schedule. Partly real: about 55% should hold.

OG AnunobyF · NYKProbably real
3-point rate+11 pts

Last 25 games of the season vs the 42 games before

Anunoby's 3-point rate is up 11 points over his last 25 games of the season (58% vs 46%). The likely reason: Miles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 25 games. Probably real: about 70% should hold.

  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 25 games
Mikal BridgesF · NYKProbably real
Points-5.3

19 games since Mar 6 vs the 63 games before

Bridges's scoring is down 5.3 points a game over his 19 games since Mar 6 (10.3 vs 15.6). Much of it is playing time: his minutes went from 34.1 to 28.8 a game. Also shot volume: his shots per 36 minutes (counting free throw trips) went from 13.8 to 11.9. Probably real: about 70% should hold.

  • MinutesHis minutes went from 34.1 to 28.8 a game (about 46% of the change)
  • Shot volumeHis shots per 36 minutes (counting free throw trips) went from 13.8 to 11.9 (about 35% of the change)
  • EfficiencyHis TS% went from 59.7% to 54.3% (about 19% of the change)
OG AnunobyF · NYKProbably real
Above-the-break 3 share+11 pts

Last 25 games of the season vs the 42 games before

Anunoby's above-the-break 3 share is up 11 points over his last 25 games of the season (33% vs 22%). The likely reason: Miles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 25 games. Probably real: about 65% should hold.

  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 25 games
Jordan ClarksonG · NYKProbably real
Minutes-5.8

30 games since Jan 19 vs the 42 games before

Clarkson's playing time is down 5.8 minutes a game over his 30 games since Jan 19 (14.4 vs 20.2). No clear cause shows up in our data; it could be an injury, a coaching choice or the schedule. Probably real: about 80% should hold.

Jordan ClarksonG · NYKProbably real
Corner-3 share-10 pts

30 games since Jan 19 vs the 42 games before

Clarkson's corner-3 share is down 10 points over his 30 games since Jan 19 (9% vs 19%). The likely reason: Miles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 10 of 40 games. Probably real: about 60% should hold.

  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 10 of 40 games
Jalen BrunsonG · NYKProbably real
Points-4.0

Last 25 games of the season vs the 49 games before

Brunson's scoring is down 4.0 points a game over his last 25 games of the season (23.4 vs 27.4). Most of it is shot volume: his shots per 36 minutes (counting free throw trips) went from 24.2 to 20.8. Also shooting efficiency: his TS% went from 58.7% to 56.6%. Probably real: about 75% should hold.

  • Shot volumeHis shots per 36 minutes (counting free throw trips) went from 24.2 to 20.8 (about 100% of the change)
  • EfficiencyHis TS% went from 58.7% to 56.6% (about 21% of the change)
Mikal BridgesF · NYKProbably real
Minutes-5.3

19 games since Mar 6 vs the 63 games before

Bridges's playing time is down 5.3 minutes a game over his 19 games since Mar 6 (28.8 vs 34.1). No clear cause shows up in our data; it could be an injury, a coaching choice or the schedule. Probably real: about 70% should hold.

Landry ShametG · NYKProbably real
Minutes+5.1

28 games since Feb 1 vs the 23 games before

Shamet's playing time is up 5.1 minutes a game over his 28 games since Feb 1 (25.3 vs 20.2). Most of it is a teammate's absence: Miles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 33 games. Probably real: about 75% should hold.

  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 33 games (about 100% of the change)
Karl-Anthony TownsC · NYKProbably real
3-point rate-8 pts

Last 25 games of the season vs the 50 games before

Towns's 3-point rate is down 8 points over his last 25 games of the season (24% vs 32%). The likely reason: Miles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 27 games. Probably real: about 70% should hold.

  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 27 games
Karl-Anthony TownsC · NYKProbably real
Above-the-break 3 share-8 pts

Last 25 games of the season vs the 50 games before

Towns's above-the-break 3 share is down 8 points over his last 25 games of the season (22% vs 31%). The likely reason: Miles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 27 games. Probably real: about 65% should hold.

  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 27 games
OG AnunobyF · NYKProbably real
Rim share-9 pts

Last 25 games of the season vs the 42 games before

Anunoby's rim share is down 9 points over his last 25 games of the season (30% vs 39%). The likely reason: Miles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 25 games. Probably real: about 60% should hold.

  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 5 of 25 games
Miles McBrideG · NYKPartly real
Points-5.1

9 games since Jan 21 vs the 32 games before

McBride's scoring is down 5.1 points a game over his 9 games since Jan 21 (8.0 vs 13.1). Most of it is playing time: his minutes went from 28.3 to 19.3 a game. Also shooting efficiency: his TS% went from 60.5% to 45.9%. Partly real: about 55% should hold.

  • MinutesHis minutes went from 28.3 to 19.3 a game (about 82% of the change)
  • EfficiencyHis TS% went from 60.5% to 45.9% (about 50% of the change)
Mikal BridgesF · NYKPartly real
TS%-5.4 pts

19 games since Mar 6 vs the 63 games before

Bridges's TS% is down 5.4 points over his 19 games since Mar 6 (54.3% vs 59.7%). Most of it is shot-making: his TS% was 1.2 points below what his shot spots predict (4.2 points above before), with Miles McBride out. Partly real: about half should hold.

  • Shot-makingHis TS% was 1.2 points below what his shot spots predict (4.2 points above before) (about 100% of the change)
  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 6 of 19 games
Jordan ClarksonG · NYKProbably real
Rim share+8 pts

30 games since Jan 19 vs the 42 games before

Clarkson's rim share is up 8 points over his 30 games since Jan 19 (30% vs 21%). The likely reason: Miles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 10 of 40 games. Probably real: about 65% should hold.

  • Teammate outMiles McBride (28 MPG before) played only 10 of 40 games
How this works

Windows

Every night we split each player's regular season (8+ games on each side) in one of three ways, in this order: the day he joined a new team; the game after which his minutes and usage shifted the most (a simple two-part split); or, if neither moved much, his last 10 games. Until the new season has enough games (about 20 each for most players) we use last season and its last 25 games, which catches the roles that changed at the trade deadline.

Is it big?

A change counts as big when it reaches:

  • Points: 4 points a game
  • Minutes: 5 minutes a game
  • Usage: 4 points
  • TS%: 4 points
  • 3P%: 5 points
  • 3-point rate: 8 points
  • Rim share: 8 points
  • Midrange share: 8 points
  • Corner-3 share: 8 points
  • Above-the-break 3 share: 8 points
  • Assists: 2 assists a game
  • Rebounds: 2.5 rebounds a game

Players need 15+ minutes a game on one side. Shooting needs 40+ threes or 60+ shots on each side.

Is it real?

Both windows are pulled toward the player's whole season by a fixed amount of weight M, the sample size where a stat is half skill and half luck: (window x n + season x M) / (n + M). A change is shown only if the pulled gap keeps at least half of the raw gap: Probably real keeps 60% or more, Partly real keeps 50 to 59%, anything less is Mostly noise and stays off the feed.

M values: 3P% 501 threes, TS% 218 shots and points 9.7 games, from Is it real?; minutes 9.4, usage 17, assists 18.9, rebounds 18.1, 3-point rate 13.9, rim share 18.2, midrange 16.8, corner 3 21.6 and above the break 15.4 games, measured on 1,766 pairs of back-to-back 10-game stretches in 2025-26. That is why 3P% changes almost never make it: threes are mostly luck until a player has taken hundreds.

Causes

Rules, each with a number. Points split exactly into minutes, shot volume and efficiency. Assists and rebounds split into minutes and per-minute rate. TS% and 3P% split into shot diet (league FG% from the spots he shot from) and shot-making (the rest). Context: a new team, a move into or out of the starting five (starting lineups from our stint data), key teammates (25+ minutes before) who missed most of the window, a new rotation player (20+ minutes), and opponents' defensive rating. We keep causes that explain 15%+ of the change and show the top three.

What we measured

Backtest on 2025-26: we ran this as if the season stopped on 3 dates and checked each flag against the rest of the season. Probably real changes kept 71% of their size on average (we predicted 66%) and 88% kept going the same way (301 flags). Partly real kept 60% (predicted 55%). Mostly noise kept 39% (predicted 33%), so the pull is a little cautious, which is the safe side.

Latest run: 393 players checked, 447 probably real and 180 partly real changes, and 273 big swings left out as mostly noise.

What it cannot see

Injuries a player played through, coaching decisions, matchups and schemes, and anything off the box score. Missing teammates are read from who played, not the injury report. Causes are rough splits, not proof; when nothing in our data fits we say so.